Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

All politics is global : explaining international regulatory regimes / Daniel W. Drezner ; with a new afterword by the author.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2007.Description: xx, 234 pages : illustrations ; 24 cmISBN:
  • 9780691096421 (paperback)
  • 0691096422 (paperback)
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: No title; No titleDDC classification:
  • 341.2
LOC classification:
  • JZ 1318 D778a 2007
Contents:
Bringing the great powers back in A theory of regulatory outcomes A typology of governance processes The global governance of the internet Club standards and international finance Rival standards and genetically modified organisms The "semi-deviant" case : trips and public health
Summary: Has globalization diluted the power of national governments to regulate their own economies? Are international governmental and nongovernmental organizations weakening the hold of nation-states on global regulatory agendas? Many observers think so. But in All Politics Is Global, Daniel Drezner argues that this view is wrong. Despite globalization, states especially the great powers still dominate international regulatory regimes, and the regulatory goals of states are driven by their domestic interests. As Drezner shows, state size still matters. The great powers the United States and the European Union remain the key players in writing global regulations, and their power is due to the size of their internal economic markets. If they agree, there will be effective global governance. If they don't agree, governance will be fragmented or ineffective. And, paradoxically, the most powerful sources of great-power preferences are the least globalized elements of their economies. Testing this revisionist model of global regulatory governance on an unusually wide variety of cases, including the Internet, finance, genetically modified organisms, and intellectual property rights, Drezner shows why there is such disparity in the strength of international regulations.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Libro Libro Biblioteca Juan Bosch Biblioteca Juan Bosch Ciencias Sociales Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) JZ 1318 D778a 2007 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 00000132697

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Bringing the great powers back in
A theory of regulatory outcomes
A typology of governance processes
The global governance of the internet
Club standards and international finance
Rival standards and genetically modified organisms
The "semi-deviant" case : trips and public health

Has globalization diluted the power of national governments to regulate their own economies? Are international governmental and nongovernmental organizations weakening the hold of nation-states on global regulatory agendas? Many observers think so. But in All Politics Is Global, Daniel Drezner argues that this view is wrong. Despite globalization, states especially the great powers still dominate international regulatory regimes, and the regulatory goals of states are driven by their domestic interests. As Drezner shows, state size still matters. The great powers the United States and the European Union remain the key players in writing global regulations, and their power is due to the size of their internal economic markets. If they agree, there will be effective global governance. If they don't agree, governance will be fragmented or ineffective. And, paradoxically, the most powerful sources of great-power preferences are the least globalized elements of their economies. Testing this revisionist model of global regulatory governance on an unusually wide variety of cases, including the Internet, finance, genetically modified organisms, and intellectual property rights, Drezner shows why there is such disparity in the strength of international regulations.

English

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.