Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Populism and civil society : the challenge to constitutional democracy / by Andrew Arato and Jean L. Cohen.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publisher: New York : Oxford University Press, 2022Description: xi, 305 pages ; 25 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780197526590 (paperback)
  • 0197526594 (paperback)
  • 9780197526583 (hardback)
  • 0197526586 (hardback)
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Online version:: Populism and civil societyDDC classification:
  • 320.56/62
LOC classification:
  • JC 423 A663p 2022
Contents:
Introduction -- Populism : why and why now? -- Populism as mobilization and as a party -- Populist governments and their logic -- Populism and constitutionalism -- Alternatives to populism.
Summary: ""Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy" is a theoretical work, that draws on extensive secondary literature as well comparative analysis of cases. The aim is to assess the significance of what is now a global phenomenon--the populist challenge to constitutional democracy. After defining populism using the methods of immanent criticism and ideal typic construction, it proceeds to examine the challenge in terms of its four main organizational forms: movement mobilization, political party, government and regime. It considers the important questions "why populism" and "why now". Without presupposing the authoritarian logic of the phenomenon in the definition, the book seeks to demonstrate it through the reconstruction of the main elements used by advocates to identify populism. It shows that the authoritarian logic is not realized in every empirical form of populism, and considers why this is so for many movement and party forms, and even populists "in" government vs. populism as 'the" government. The historical examples of the latter we identify as "hybrid" regimes blending authoritarian elements and residual democratic forms. The book then proceeds to consider the uneasy relationship of populism to constitutionalism. It presents populism as a form of abusive or instrumental "constitutionalism" often relying on the alleged permanence of the quasi-revolutionary constituent power. It concludes by outlining a non- and anti-populist project of democratization and social justice, distinguishing between the "popular" and the "populist" and outlining a program based on the plurality of democracies and the rescue of some of left populism's "host ideologies""-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Libro Libro Biblioteca Juan Bosch Biblioteca Juan Bosch Ciencias Sociales Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) JC 423 A663p 2022 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 00000128299

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction -- Populism : why and why now? -- Populism as mobilization and as a party -- Populist governments and their logic -- Populism and constitutionalism -- Alternatives to populism.

""Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy" is a theoretical work, that draws on extensive secondary literature as well comparative analysis of cases. The aim is to assess the significance of what is now a global phenomenon--the populist challenge to constitutional democracy. After defining populism using the methods of immanent criticism and ideal typic construction, it proceeds to examine the challenge in terms of its four main organizational forms: movement mobilization, political party, government and regime. It considers the important questions "why populism" and "why now". Without presupposing the authoritarian logic of the phenomenon in the definition, the book seeks to demonstrate it through the reconstruction of the main elements used by advocates to identify populism. It shows that the authoritarian logic is not realized in every empirical form of populism, and considers why this is so for many movement and party forms, and even populists "in" government vs. populism as 'the" government. The historical examples of the latter we identify as "hybrid" regimes blending authoritarian elements and residual democratic forms. The book then proceeds to consider the uneasy relationship of populism to constitutionalism. It presents populism as a form of abusive or instrumental "constitutionalism" often relying on the alleged permanence of the quasi-revolutionary constituent power. It concludes by outlining a non- and anti-populist project of democratization and social justice, distinguishing between the "popular" and the "populist" and outlining a program based on the plurality of democracies and the rescue of some of left populism's "host ideologies""-- Provided by publisher.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.