Reading the Constitution : why I chose pragmatism, not textualism / Stephen Breyer.
Material type:
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781668021538
- 1668021536
- Why I chose pragmatism, not textualism
- 342.7302 23
- KF4550 B848r 2024
Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Automatización y Procesos Técnicos | Automatización y Procesos Técnicos (1er. Piso) | KF4550 B848r 2024 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 00000188880 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 269-321) and index.
Preface: My way -- Part I: Purpose vs. textualism. Purpose-based approaches -- The textualist approach -- Part II: Interpreting statutory law. The traditional use of text and purpose -- The text/purpose divide -- Static or dynamic? -- Consequences -- Legislative history -- Constitutional values -- Resolving the text/purpose tension -- Why judges should consider purposes: a summary -- Part III: Interpreting the Constitution. The Constitution -- The traditional approach to constitutional interpretation -- Constitutional textualism -- When the text runs out: the limits of constitutional textualism -- Legal stability: stare decisis -- Part IV: Why values, purposes, and workability provide a better way to interpret the Constitution. Workability: history and practical experience -- Workability: deciding where values conflict -- Workability: direct application of basic values -- Part V: Paradigm shifts on the court. Three paradigm shifts -- Are we undergoing the next paradigm shift? -- Conclusion.
An analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution.
There are no comments on this title.