Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The ethical lobbyist : reforming Washington's influence industry / Thomas T. Holyoke.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: Eng Publication details: Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, 2016.Edition: First paperback editionDescription: vii, 55 p. : illustrations ; 23 cmISBN:
  • 9781626163805 (pb : alk. paper)
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 172
LOC classification:
  • JK 1118 H761e 2016
Contents:
Growth industry -- A brief history of American interest groups -- The lobbying and influence industry -- The constitutional right to petition and lobby -- The history of the right to petition -- Lobbying's constitutional protection -- Corruption alleged and real -- First try : federal regulation of lobbying act -- Trying again : LDA and HLOGA -- Trying for even more -- A perspective on ethical lobbying -- The attorney-client analogy -- Counter-pressures and unethical lobbying -- Ethics and reform -- Requirements of ethical lobbying -- Recommendations for reform -- Conclusion.
Summary: The public's view of lobbying is that it is synonymous with corruption. Corruption is rare despite the popular perception, but there is plenty of evidence that the lobbying profession has a serious problem with inaccurate representation of member or client interests, which Holyoke argues is fundamentally an ethics problem. Holyoke's research has shown that lobbyists go against their clients' or members' interests about 50% of the time in order to curry favor with lawmakers. Why is this unethical and how can it be prevented? The First Amendment protects political participation and representation--citizens freely assembled (into interest groups) may employ professional petitioners (lobbyists) to faithfully press their causes to lawmakers, but this also shows why compromising member interests is unethical. Holyoke makes the analogy that the lobbyist-client relationship should be more like the attorney-client relationship of ironclad representation. He says that the current laws regulating lobbying are inadequate when it comes to ensuring ethical behavior. Finally, he presents a set of principles and a specific proposal for reform based on these principles.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Vol info Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Libro Libro Biblioteca Juan Bosch Biblioteca Juan Bosch Ciencias Sociales Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) JK 1118 H761e 2016 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 1 Available 00000122925

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Growth industry -- A brief history of American interest groups -- The lobbying and influence industry -- The constitutional right to petition and lobby -- The history of the right to petition -- Lobbying's constitutional protection -- Corruption alleged and real -- First try : federal regulation of lobbying act -- Trying again : LDA and HLOGA -- Trying for even more -- A perspective on ethical lobbying -- The attorney-client analogy -- Counter-pressures and unethical lobbying -- Ethics and reform -- Requirements of ethical lobbying -- Recommendations for reform -- Conclusion.

The public's view of lobbying is that it is synonymous with corruption. Corruption is rare despite the popular perception, but there is plenty of evidence that the lobbying profession has a serious problem with inaccurate representation of member or client interests, which Holyoke argues is fundamentally an ethics problem. Holyoke's research has shown that lobbyists go against their clients' or members' interests about 50% of the time in order to curry favor with lawmakers. Why is this unethical and how can it be prevented? The First Amendment protects political participation and representation--citizens freely assembled (into interest groups) may employ professional petitioners (lobbyists) to faithfully press their causes to lawmakers, but this also shows why compromising member interests is unethical. Holyoke makes the analogy that the lobbyist-client relationship should be more like the attorney-client relationship of ironclad representation. He says that the current laws regulating lobbying are inadequate when it comes to ensuring ethical behavior. Finally, he presents a set of principles and a specific proposal for reform based on these principles.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.