Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Rethinking the Patriot Act : keeping America safe and free / Stephen J. Schulhofer.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: Eng Publication details: New York : Century Foundation Press, c2005.Description: xi, 163 p. ; 22 cmISBN:
  • 0870784951 (pbk. : alk. paper)
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 345.73/02 22
LOC classification:
  • KF4850.A322001 S38 2005
Online resources:
Contents:
Understanding the challenge : surveillance needs and their dangers -- Tracking Al Qaeda : foreign intelligence searches and surveillance -- Accessing documents and records -- Enhanced powers in conventional law enforcement -- Security and freedom for the long haul.
Summary: Schulhofer explains the act's most important provisions and reviews the best information currently available to gauge their usefulness and their effects in practice. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Schulhofer argues that much of the Patriot Act was essential, and some of it, if not essential, was reasonably defensible.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Vol info Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Libro Libro Biblioteca Juan Bosch Biblioteca Juan Bosch Ciencias Sociales Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) KF4850.A322001 S38 2005 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 4 1 Available 00000111132

Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-153) and index.

Understanding the challenge : surveillance needs and their dangers -- Tracking Al Qaeda : foreign intelligence searches and surveillance -- Accessing documents and records -- Enhanced powers in conventional law enforcement -- Security and freedom for the long haul.

Schulhofer explains the act's most important provisions and reviews the best information currently available to gauge their usefulness and their effects in practice. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Schulhofer argues that much of the Patriot Act was essential, and some of it, if not essential, was reasonably defensible.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.